Competition-level questions, marked like an examiner

Competition-level questions, marked like an examiner

Olympiad biology sits past the school syllabus and one step below the research literature. The gap is filled by doing hard questions and getting honest marks, which is what a model is good at and a school timetable cannot supply.

Why the mainstream APIs fail here

Past papers are scarce and official answers are terse. A school teacher can mark syllabus questions but not competition depth, and general chatbots fold at exactly the multi-step reasoning across systems that the competitions test on purpose.

How MagmaRouter is used for this

Work past papers and ask for marking with the reasoning exposed, not just the letter. Ask for questions of the same shape at the same difficulty once a type is mastered. Ask what single topic, if mastered, would move the score most; it is rarely the one being studied.

A working loop

  1. Do the question fully closed-book before any help; the struggle is the training.
  2. Mark hard and ask why each wrong option was built; distractors are written on purpose.
  3. One topic at a time, mastered, beats the whole syllabus skimmed.

Prompts are not stored. A signed receipt of the hash comes back on every call, so you can prove later what MagmaRouter logged. Details are on the privacy page. Per-model prices are on /models and the pricing model is on /pricing.

Related